Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, along with case law at both the federal and state levels.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the uncovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only finished If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. Inside the meantime police shall remain neutral while in the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of your individuals is indulged in criminal exercise the police shall just take prompt action against them under legislation. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had nothing at all to fret about.
Should you find an error from the written content of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
10. Without touching the merits on the case of the issue of yearly increases inside the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these kinds of yearly increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment for being made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police should be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, make sure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair into the offender and the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Generally, only an appeal accepted by the court of lawful object case study past resort will resolve these types of differences and, For numerous reasons, these kinds of appeals are frequently not granted.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are recognized by executive organizations based on statutes.